매달, 우리는 1000명 이상의 사람들이 시험 준비를 잘하고 시험을 잘 통과할 수 있도록 도와줍니다.
Managing Teams and Individuals 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2025년10월10일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 CIPS L5M1 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 L5M1 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 38개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.
정답: Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual and relates to personal satisfaction, growth, and achievement, rather than external rewards such as pay. The Job Characteristics Model (Hackman and Oldham) identifies several features of a role that can make it intrinsically motivating.
The first is Skill Variety. A role that allows employees to use a range of skills and abilities prevents boredom and makes the job more stimulating. For example, a procurement professional who undertakes supplier negotiations, contract management, and market analysis will find their role more engaging than one limited to routine administration.
The second is Task Identity. This means being able to complete a whole piece of work from start to finish. Employees are more motivated when they can see a clear outcome. In procurement, this could be managing a sourcing project end-to-end, from supplier selection through to contract award. Thirdly, Task Significance adds motivation by making employees aware of the impact of their work on others. If individuals see that their role contributes to organisational goals or wider society, they gain intrinsic satisfaction. For example, a buyer working on sustainable sourcing projects may feel motivated by contributing to environmental and ethical improvements.
The fourth is Autonomy. When employees have control over how they perform their work, they feel trusted and empowered. In procurement, this could mean giving staff flexibility in how they manage supplier relationships or structure negotiations, rather than micro-managing every step.
Finally, Feedback is a key factor. Employees are motivated when they receive clear information on their performance, either from managers, colleagues, or the work itself. For example, a procurement professional who gets recognition for achieving cost savings or reducing supplier risks will feel intrinsically rewarded.
In summary, roles that offer skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback are more likely to be intrinsically motivating. For managers, designing jobs with these characteristics is essential for creating engaged and high-performing teams, particularly in procurement where complex, meaningful, and responsible work opportunities can drive motivation.
정답: The Two-Factor Hygiene Theory, developed by Frederick Herzberg, explains what drives employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction at work. Herzberg argued that there are two categories of factors that affect motivation.
The first category is Hygiene Factors. These are extrinsic elements such as pay, working conditions, company policies, job security and supervision. If these are poor or absent, employees become dissatisfied. However, their presence alone does not create motivation C they simply prevent dissatisfaction. For example, in procurement, if buyers do not have fair pay or adequate systems, they will feel frustrated, but improving pay alone will not guarantee enthusiasm or creativity.
The second category is Motivators. These are intrinsic to the job itself, such as achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, and personal growth. When present, these factors actively increase motivation and job satisfaction. For instance, giving a procurement professional ownership of a supplier relationship, recognising their success in a negotiation, or offering training opportunities can significantly boost motivation.
The impact of Herzberg’s theory on motivation is significant. Managers cannot rely only on hygiene factors like pay and working conditions to motivate staff. These need to be in place to avoid dissatisfaction, but true motivation comes from providing meaningful work, opportunities for growth, and recognition.
In practice, this means managers should:
Ensure hygiene factors are adequate (fair pay, safe environment, supportive policies).
Focus on motivators such as giving responsibility, offering progression pathways, and recognising achievement.
Design jobs with variety and challenge, rather than only repetitive tasks.
Encourage intrinsic motivation through empowerment and involvement in decision-making. In procurement and supply, applying Herzberg’s theory could mean ensuring staff have reliable systems and clear processes (hygiene), while also providing opportunities to lead supplier negotiations, recognise cost savings achievements, or involve staff in strategic sourcing projects (motivators).
In conclusion, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory shows that avoiding dissatisfaction through hygiene factors is not enough. Managers must also provide motivators to create true engagement and drive performance. For procurement leaders, balancing both sets of factors is essential for building high-performing, motivated teams.
정답: Part A C Knowledge Transfer (10 points):
Knowledge transfer refers to the process of sharing skills, experience, insights and information from one person or group to another within an organisation. It ensures that valuable expertise is not lost and that best practice can be replicated. This can happen formally, such as through training, mentoring, or documented procedures, or informally, through conversations, collaboration, and shared experiences. In procurement, knowledge transfer might involve senior buyers passing negotiation tactics to junior colleagues or documenting supplier performance insights in a shared database.
Part B C Ensuring Strong Knowledge Management (15 points):
Managers play a key role in creating systems and cultures that support knowledge sharing. Some ways include:
Creating knowledge repositories C using databases, intranets, or category management playbooks where information is stored and accessible to all team members.
Encouraging mentoring and coaching C pairing experienced staff with new employees helps transfer tacit knowledge that may not be written down.
Promoting collaboration and teamwork C cross-functional project teams and regular knowledge-sharing meetings spread expertise across functions.
Using technology C collaboration platforms (e.g., SharePoint, Teams) allow procurement staff to record supplier insights, lessons learned, and contract data in real time.
Rewarding knowledge sharing C recognising and incentivising individuals who share expertise encourages a culture of openness rather than knowledge hoarding.
Embedding learning in processes C after-action reviews, lessons-learned sessions after supplier negotiations or tenders ensure experiences are captured systematically.
Leadership behaviours C managers must role-model transparency and collaboration, showing staff that sharing knowledge is valued.
Conclusion:
Knowledge transfer is about ensuring that critical experience and expertise are shared across the organisation. Managers can ensure strong knowledge management by combining systems, processes, and culture C from IT tools and databases to mentoring and recognition. In procurement, effective knowledge management helps avoid repeated mistakes, builds stronger supplier relationships, and improves decision-making across the team.
정답: Individuals learn in different ways, and managers must understand these methods to develop their teams effectively.
One method is formal learning, such as classroom courses, e-learning, or qualifications like CIPS. This gives structured knowledge and ensures consistency, but it may lack immediate workplace application.
A second method is on-the-job learning, where skills are developed through daily tasks, job rotation or shadowing. This is practical and tailored to the workplace but may be inconsistent without good supervision.
A third approach is experiential learning, based on Kolb’s cycle of experience, reflection, conceptualisation and testing. For example, a buyer may learn negotiation skills by practising in a live supplier meeting, reflecting on performance, and then improving.
Another method is social learning, as described by Bandur
a. Individuals learn by observing and modelling others’ behaviour. In procurement, junior staff may observe how senior colleagues manage supplier relationships and copy effective practices.
Finally, there is self-directed learning, where individuals take initiative through reading, research or online courses. This builds independence but requires strong personal motivation.
In contrast, formal learning is structured and standardised, while experiential and social learning are more practical and situational. On-the-job learning blends practice with support, whereas self-directed learning provides autonomy but less guidance. Most organisations use a mix of these methods to ensure balanced development.
One important factor that influences learning is an individual’s learning style. According to Honey and Mumford, some people are activists (learn best by doing), others are reflectors (learn by observing and thinking), theorists (prefer analysing concepts), or pragmatists (want to apply ideas in practice). For example, in procurement training, an activist may benefit from a role-play negotiation, while a theorist may prefer studying sourcing models before application. Managers who recognise learning styles can tailor development activities to individual preferences, making learning more effective.
In conclusion, individuals can learn through formal, on-the-job, experiential, social, or self-directed approaches, each with strengths and weaknesses. Learning effectiveness depends on personal factors such as style, and managers who understand these differences can create development opportunities that are both motivating and productive.
정답: Definition of Emotional Intelligence (5 points):
Emotional Intelligence (EI), popularised by Daniel Goleman, is the ability to recognise, understand, and manage one’s own emotions as well as the emotions of others. It involves self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. A high EQ enables individuals to manage stress, build strong relationships, and influence others effectively.
Benefits of High EQ in Procurement (20 points):
Improved Negotiation Skills: Procurement professionals with high EQ can read emotions, adapt communication styles, and manage conflict effectively during supplier negotiations. This leads to stronger outcomes and sustainable supplier relationships.
Stronger Stakeholder Management: EQ helps buyers understand the needs and concerns of internal stakeholders (finance, operations, CSR). This fosters trust, persuasion, and collaboration in category strategies.
Conflict Resolution: In diverse teams or complex supply chains, conflict is common. High EQ managers can defuse tensions, listen actively, and find win-win solutions, maintaining team cohesion and supplier cooperation.
Resilience Under Pressure: Procurement often deals with supply crises, deadlines, or cost pressures. High EQ professionals manage stress, stay calm, and make rational decisions under pressure, maintaining credibility.
Team Leadership and Motivation: Managers with high EQ can inspire, coach, and support individuals, recognising different personalities and motivations. This improves morale, retention, and performance in procurement teams.
Ethical and Responsible Behaviour: High EQ includes empathy and awareness of wider impacts. Procurement leaders with EQ are more likely to consider ethical sourcing, sustainability, and supplier welfare, aligning decisions with organisational values.
Change Management: Procurement functions often undergo transformation (e.g., digital tools, supplier consolidation). Leaders with high EQ can communicate sensitively, understand employee concerns, and build buy-in for change.
Conclusion:
Emotional intelligence is the ability to manage emotions and relationships effectively. In procurement, high EQ strengthens negotiations, builds trust with stakeholders, resolves conflicts, motivates teams, and supports ethical and sustainable practices. It is therefore a critical capability for procurement leaders aiming to achieve both operational excellence and strategic value.
정답: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (10 points):
Motivation refers to the internal drive that influences people’s behaviour and performance. Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual and is linked to personal satisfaction, enjoyment, achievement, or a sense of purpose. For example, a procurement professional may feel motivated by solving complex supplier challenges or contributing to sustainability goals.
Extrinsic motivation comes from external rewards such as pay, bonuses, promotions, or recognition. For instance, a buyer might be motivated by achieving cost savings to receive a financial bonus. Both types of motivation are important in the workplace. Intrinsic motivation sustains long-term commitment, while extrinsic rewards provide short-term incentives. Effective managers balance both to maximise performance.
One theory of motivation (15 points):
A widely used theory is Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Herzberg identified two sets of factors that influence motivation:
Hygiene factors C these do not motivate if present, but if absent, they cause dissatisfaction. Examples include salary, working conditions, policies, supervision, and job security. For example, if procurement staff lack proper tools or fair pay, they may feel dissatisfied, but simply improving pay will not necessarily make them highly motivated.
Motivators C these are intrinsic to the job and lead to satisfaction and motivation. They include achievement, recognition, responsibility, personal growth, and meaningful work. For instance, giving a buyer responsibility to lead a supplier negotiation or recognising their success increases intrinsic motivation.
Herzberg’s theory highlights that managers cannot rely on pay and policies alone. They must remove dissatisfaction by ensuring fair hygiene factors and then boost engagement by providing motivators. In procurement, this could mean ensuring fair contracts, proper systems, and clear processes (hygiene factors), while also giving staff opportunities for training, career progression, and recognition (motivators).
Conclusion:
Intrinsic motivation is about internal satisfaction, while extrinsic motivation relies on external
rewards. Herzberg’s theory shows that managers should address hygiene factors to avoid dissatisfaction but must focus on motivators to truly drive performance. For procurement and supply leaders, combining both ensures staff remain engaged, loyal, and productive.
정답: A heterogeneous or diverse workforce refers to a group of employees with varied characteristics, backgrounds, and perspectives. Diversity can relate to visible differences such as age, gender, ethnicity, or disability, as well as invisible factors like personality, values, experiences, and thinking styles. A diverse workforce is valuable because it brings multiple perspectives, creativity, and innovation, which can improve decision-making and problem-solving. However, it can also create challenges in communication, conflict management, and team cohesion if not managed effectively. In procurement and supply management, diversity can mean having team members from different professional disciplines, cultural backgrounds, or experience levels. This mix can lead to better supplier negotiations, innovation in category strategies, and greater sensitivity to global ethical standards. For managers, the challenge lies in understanding and leveraging individual differences to build cohesive, high-performing teams.
One useful personality model for understanding team members is the Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN model). This model is widely accepted in psychology and provides a framework for identifying personality differences across five dimensions:
Openness to Experience C measures creativity, curiosity, and willingness to try new things. In procurement, high openness could support innovation in supplier strategies.
Conscientiousness C relates to organisation, responsibility, and dependability. A conscientious buyer is likely to follow compliance rules and deliver accurate work.
Extraversion C reflects sociability, assertiveness, and energy. Extroverts may excel in supplier negotiations and stakeholder engagement.
Agreeableness C indicates cooperation, empathy, and trust. Highly agreeable individuals may be effective in collaboration but could avoid conflict even when necessary.
Neuroticism (Emotional Stability) C refers to sensitivity to stress and emotional control. Low neuroticism (high stability) is ideal in high-pressure procurement negotiations.
By applying this model, a manager can gain insights into the personalities of their team, allocate roles effectively, and provide tailored support. For example, a procurement leader may assign highly conscientious individuals to compliance-heavy processes, while extroverts may be placed in supplier-facing roles.
The use of the Big Five also helps managers balance team dynamics, identify potential conflict, and
design training or coaching interventions. Understanding personality traits supports motivation strategies (e.g., Herzberg, Maslow), builds stronger communication, and enhances trust within diverse teams.
In conclusion, a heterogeneous workforce brings significant benefits but requires skilful management to harness its potential. The Big Five Personality Traits provide a structured and evidence-based tool for understanding individuals, enabling managers to lead diverse teams more effectively and align strengths with organisational goals.
정답: Organisational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, norms and behaviours that shape “the way things are done” in a workplace. One of the most widely used models is Charles Handy’s four types of organisational culture, which describe different ways in which organisations can operate.
The first is the Power Culture. In this type, authority is concentrated at the centre, usually with a strong leader or small group of individuals. Decisions are made quickly, and personal influence is key. This culture can be dynamic and decisive but may create dependency on the leader and limit employee autonomy. In procurement, a power culture might mean senior management unilaterally deciding supplier strategies without consulting the wider team.
The second is the Role Culture. Here, the organisation is highly structured with clear roles, rules, and procedures. Power comes from position rather than personality. Stability and order are prioritised, making it efficient in predictable environments. However, it can be rigid and resistant to change. In procurement, this culture might be seen in public sector bodies where strict compliance, policies, and audit controls dominate purchasing activities.
The third is the Task Culture. This type is project-oriented, with teams formed to solve problems or deliver objectives. Power is based on expertise, and collaboration is valued. It is flexible, innovative, and well-suited to dynamic environments, but can cause conflict if resources are limited. In procurement, task culture is often evident in cross-functional category teams formed to deliver strategic sourcing projects.
The fourth is the Person Culture. Here, the focus is on individuals rather than the organisation.
Employees see themselves as more important than the structure, and autonomy is prioritised. This is rare in large organisations but can be found in professional partnerships such as law or consultancy firms. In procurement, a person culture may appear where highly specialised experts operate independently, sometimes resisting organisational control.
In conclusion, Handy’s four types of culture ― power, role, task, and person ― each offer strengths and weaknesses. Effective managers must understand the prevailing culture in their organisation and adapt their leadership approach. In procurement and supply, recognising cultural influences is vital to building cohesive teams, aligning strategies, and driving ethical and sustainable practices.
정답: Understanding individuals is crucial for effective leadership. People bring unique qualities to the workplace, which influence how they behave, perform, and interact. Four important factors that make up the individual are as follows.
Firstly, personality plays a major role. Traits such as extroversion, conscientiousness, or openness (from models like the Big Five) influence how individuals communicate, make decisions, and fit into teams. For example, an extrovert may thrive in negotiation roles, while an introvert may excel in analytical procurement tasks.
Secondly, attitudes and values shape how individuals respond to work situations. Values around ethics, sustainability, or fairness can influence motivation and alignment with organisational culture. In procurement, a professional with strong ethical values may be more resistant to corruption risks. Thirdly, perception and motivation affect behaviour. Individuals interpret situations differently, and motivation theories such as Maslow, Herzberg or McGregor’s Theory X/Y show how personal drivers impact performance. Some may be motivated by pay, others by recognition or career development. Finally, abilities and skills define what individuals can contribute. These include technical competencies, problem-solving skills, and interpersonal abilities. A skilled negotiator, for example, adds significant value to a procurement team.
Managers must also choose effective ways to lead teams. Three common approaches are: Autocratic leadership C where the manager makes decisions without consulting the team. This can be effective in crises or routine, highly regulated tasks (e.g., compliance procurement), but risks low morale if overused.
Democratic or participative leadership C where managers involve team members in decision-making. This improves engagement, creativity, and buy-in.
For example, involving procurement staff in category strategy development can generate stronger results.
Laissez-faire leadership C where the manager provides minimal direction, allowing the team high autonomy. This works well when teams are highly skilled and self-motivated, but may cause confusion if individuals lack experience.
In conclusion, individuals are shaped by their personality, values, perceptions/motivations, and skills, all of which affect their workplace performance. Managers can choose between autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire leadership depending on the situation. Successful leaders adapt their style to the individuals and teams they manage, ensuring both high performance and motivation.
정답: The human relations approach to management developed in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also by social needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.
The foundation of this school came from the Hawthorne Studies (Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.
Key principles of the human relations approach include:
Focus on people rather than just processes C recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.
Motivation through recognition and belonging C linking to theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s motivators.
Leadership style matters C supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.
Team dynamics are critical C informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.
Job satisfaction drives performance C happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal. Advantages of the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.
Disadvantages include the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through “false concern.” It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.
In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.
In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.
정답: A bureaucratic management style is based on the theories of Max Weber, who described bureaucracy as a structured, rule-based and hierarchical way of organising work. In this style, managers rely heavily on formal rules, policies and procedures to direct employee behaviour. Decision-making authority follows a clear chain of command, and employees are expected to follow established processes without deviation. Job roles are highly specialised and responsibilities are clearly defined. The emphasis is on order, consistency and compliance rather than flexibility or creativity.
This approach is often seen in government departments, regulatory bodies, or large organisations where compliance, accountability and control are critical. For example, in procurement and supply, bureaucratic management may be applied in highly regulated environments such as public sector purchasing, where adherence to policies, legal frameworks and audit requirements is essential.
Advantages of the bureaucratic style include:
Clarity and consistency: clear rules and procedures mean employees know exactly what is expected of them.
Fairness and equality: decisions are made based on rules, not personal favouritism, reducing bias.
Accountability and control: strong documentation and audit trails improve transparency.
Efficiency in routine tasks: structured processes can streamline repetitive, transactional work (e.g., purchase-to-pay).
Disadvantages include:
Inflexibility: rigid rules make it difficult to adapt to change or unique situations.
Low motivation: workers may feel disempowered or demoralised by lack of autonomy.
Slow decision-making: multiple levels of approval can create delays.
Stifled innovation: focus on compliance discourages creativity and proactive problem-solving.
In conclusion, the bureaucratic management style is effective where consistency, compliance and control are needed, such as in regulated procurement activities. However, it can be limiting in dynamic environments where flexibility, innovation and speed of decision-making are essential. Successful managers may therefore adopt bureaucratic methods for governance but balance them with more adaptive styles for strategic and innovative work.
정답: The Taylorism school of thought, also known as Scientific Management, was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the early 20th century. It aimed to improve efficiency and productivity by applying systematic, scientific methods to the management of work. Its key principles can be summarised as follows.
The first principle is the scientific study of work. Taylor rejected traditional “rule of thumb” methods, instead advocating time-and-motion studies to identify the most efficient way of completing tasks. This broke jobs into smaller, measurable steps.
Secondly, Taylor emphasised the division of labour and specialisation. Workers should focus on narrowly defined tasks, allowing them to become faster and more efficient, similar to parts in a machine.
Thirdly, he argued for scientific selection and training of workers. Instead of leaving workers to train themselves, managers should select the right person for the job and provide formal training in the “one best way” to complete tasks.
Fourthly, Taylor stressed managerial control and supervision. He believed management should plan, organise and set methods, while workers should focus on carrying them out. This created a strong separation between planning and execution.
Finally, Taylor promoted financial incentives as motivators. He assumed that workers are primarily motivated by pay, so piece-rate systems and performance-based rewards were used to encourage higher output.
Taylorism brought many benefits, such as increased productivity, efficiency, and predictability in mass production industries. However, it also attracted criticism for treating workers like machines, reducing autonomy, and ignoring social and psychological needs. From a modern procurement perspective, its ideas are still visible in standardised processes such as purchase-to-pay systems, KPIs, and efficiency-driven shared services. However, organisations today often balance these principles with more human-centred approaches to motivation and teamwork.
In conclusion, the key principles of Taylorism were scientific analysis of work, specialisation, scientific selection and training, strict managerial control, and financial incentives. While its focus on efficiency shaped early management thinking, modern leaders must also consider motivation, empowerment, and adaptability to achieve sustainable success.
정답: Theories of management provide different ways of understanding how organisations can be led effectively. Two important perspectives are the systems approach and the contingency approach. Both move beyond early “one best way” classical theories and instead highlight the complexity and adaptability required in modern organisations.
The systems approach views the organisation as an integrated whole made up of interdependent subsystems such as HR, finance, operations and procurement. It is based on systems theory, seeing organisations as “open systems” that interact with their external environment. Inputs such as people, information and resources are transformed into outputs such as products, services and stakeholder value. Feedback loops are essential to monitor performance and make adjustments. The key idea is synergy ― the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. For example, in procurement, sourcing decisions influence not only supplier performance but also finance (budgets), operations (continuity), and CSR (sustainability). A systems approach ensures that procurement strategies are aligned to wider organisational goals and continuous improvement.
The contingency approach develops this idea further, arguing that there is no universal way to manage. Instead, the best approach depends on situational factors such as environment, size, technology, or workforce capability. It rejects “one-size-fits-all” rules and stresses that management must adapt. For example, in a stable market, a hierarchical structure with formal rules may work well, whereas in volatile markets, flexible and decentralised decision-making is more effective. In procurement, this could mean using strict process controls for routine, low-value items, but adopting agile, collaborative approaches when managing strategic supplier partnerships in uncertain global supply chains.
In comparison, the systems approach gives managers a holistic view of how different parts of the organisation connect and interact with the external environment, while the contingency approach emphasises adaptability and situational leadership. Together, they suggest that effective managers need both a broad systems perspective and the ability to tailor their approach depending on context. In conclusion, the systems approach stresses coordination, integration and feedback across the organisation, while the contingency approach stresses flexibility and the idea that “it depends.” Both are highly relevant to procurement and supply leaders who must integrate across functions and adapt strategies to dynamic and uncertain supply environments.
정답: A psychological contract refers to the unwritten and informal expectations that exist between employer and employee, beyond the formal employment contract. It is built on perceptions of fairness, trust, and mutual obligation. For example, an employee may expect career development, recognition and fair treatment, while the employer expects loyalty, commitment, and discretionary effort. Unlike a legal contract, it is subjective, evolving, and deeply influenced by organisational culture and management behaviour.
Several factors influence the strength of the psychological contract. Leadership style is crucial: a participative, empowering approach helps employees feel valued, while autocratic or inconsistent leadership weakens trust. Organisational culture also plays a role; a supportive, ethical culture creates fairness, whereas a toxic or discriminatory environment erodes confidence. Communication is another factor C transparent and honest messages during performance reviews or organisational change maintain alignment of expectations, whereas misinformation or silence damages the relationship. Reward and recognition are key, since inconsistencies in promotion or pay may create perceptions of unfairness. WorkClife balance and flexibility also matter, particularly in modern hybrid workplaces. Finally, opportunities for development such as training, mentoring, or exposure to new projects sustain the sense of reciprocal value between employer and employee.
Employers can take several steps to protect the psychological contract from being broken. Firstly, clear communication of job roles, objectives and expectations reduces misunderstandings. Fair and consistent treatment across employees ensures equality and avoids resentment. Involving employees in decision-making through surveys or consultation gives them a voice and strengthens commitment. Employers should also invest in people through coaching, mentoring and career development pathways, demonstrating a long-term interest in their growth. Recognition of achievement, both financial and non-financial, reinforces the sense of value. When organisational changes occur, managers should follow good change management practice, such as Lewin’s three-step model or Kotter’s stages, to ensure transparency and inclusion. Finally, ethical and values-driven leadership is vital, as trust is easily broken if managers behave dishonestly or fail to live up to organisational values.
For example, in a procurement setting, if a buyer is promised involvement in international supplier negotiations but never receives the opportunity, the psychological contract is broken, potentially leading to disengagement or resignation. Employers can prevent this by giving realistic job previews,
following through on commitments, and offering development opportunities aligned to employees’ expectations.
In conclusion, the psychological contract is a powerful but fragile element of the employment relationship. It is influenced by leadership, culture, communication, rewards, and development opportunities. By maintaining fairness, clarity, recognition, and open dialogue, employers can protect and strengthen this contract, leading to higher engagement, motivation and retention of talent.
정답: Organisations can be understood in many different ways through metaphors, which help managers and leaders interpret behaviour, culture and performance. Morgan’s metaphors are widely used to explain these perspectives.
Five key metaphors are explained below.
The first metaphor is the organisation as a machine. Here the business is seen like a well-oiled mechanism with standardised processes, clear rules, hierarchy and repeatable outputs. This works well for efficiency and control, for example in a procurement shared services function, but can be rigid and demotivating if flexibility and creativity are required.
The second is the organisation as an organism. This views the business as a living system that must adapt to its environment. Structures, processes and leadership styles must “fit” the context, whether technological, market-driven or human needs. In procurement, this could be seen when category teams adapt to sudden supply market changes, showing flexibility to survive in a dynamic environment.
The third is the organisation as a brain. This emphasises learning, feedback loops, and knowledge-sharing, where continuous improvement and innovation are central. Leaders encourage collaboration, reflection and data-driven decision-making. For procurement, this might be using spend analytics, lessons learned from supplier negotiations, and knowledge sharing across teams to improve sourcing strategies.
The fourth metaphor is the organisation as a culture. This highlights the shared values, beliefs and rituals that shape “how things are done.” Leadership here involves role-modelling behaviours, building ethical cultures, and maintaining consistency between words and actions. In procurement, culture may show through an organisation’s commitment to ethical sourcing, sustainability, and supplier diversity.
Finally, the organisation as a political system sees it as an arena of power and influence where decisions are made through negotiation, persuasion and coalition-building. Managers must understand power bases and stakeholder interests. In procurement, for instance, winning senior approval for a sourcing strategy may require influencing finance, operations, and CSR teams with different agendas.
In summary, each metaphor offers insights into how organisations function. The machine focuses on control, the organism on adaptability, the brain on learning, the culture on shared values, and the
political system on power and influence. Good leaders in procurement should recognise that all these metaphors may apply in different situations, and use them to manage individuals and teams more effectively