매달, 우리는 1000명 이상의 사람들이 시험 준비를 잘하고 시험을 잘 통과할 수 있도록 도와줍니다.
CrowdStrike Certified Cloud Specialist - 2025 Version 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2025년11월17일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 CrowdStrike CCCS-203b 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 CCCS-203b 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 300개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Resource limitations are managed by Kubernetes resource quotas and configurations, not image assessments.
Option B: Image assessments in Falcon Cloud Security focus on analyzing container images for vulnerabilities, outdated dependencies, and misconfigurations, ensuring the images are secure before being deployed in production.
Option C: Runtime monitoring detects malicious behavior during the container's operation but is a separate capability from image assessments, which are focused on static analysis.
Option D: Network policies manage communication between containers and are enforced by Kubernetes network plugins or tools like Calico, not image assessments.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Using the CrowdStrike API to trigger one-time scans can supplement assessments but is not a replacement for an automated schedule. Without regular scans, potential vulnerabilities may go unnoticed, reducing overall security efficacy.
Option B: Manually initiating security posture assessments each time is inefficient and prone to human error. CSPM tools like CrowdStrike support automated scheduling to ensure consistent monitoring and compliance without manual intervention.
Option C: While enabling default cloud provider security tools is a good practice, these tools are separate from CrowdStrike's CSPM capabilities. Assuming synchronization without explicitly setting up a schedule in CrowdStrike will leave the assessments incomplete.
Option D: Defining a schedule in the CrowdStrike console is the correct approach. The console provides options to set frequency (e.g., daily, weekly) and scope (e.g., specific cloud accounts or all accounts), ensuring continuous posture monitoring. This setup is foundational for proactive security management.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Denying access to sensitive resources for unauthorized roles enhances security and ensures that users cannot access resources they are not entitled to.
Option B: Read-only access aligns with least privilege, ensuring analysts can view data without modifying it. This is a correctly configured policy.
Option C: This misconfiguration grants excessive privileges to all users, violating the principle of least privilege and increasing the risk of accidental or intentional misuse. Access to production environments should be tightly controlled and limited to specific, authorized roles.
Option D: Granting developers permissions tailored to their role in a non-production environment aligns with best practices and does not pose a security risk.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: While managed identities are a secure alternative to Service Principals, this is not always feasible for existing workflows. It may require significant reconfiguration, making it a long-term consideration rather than an immediate action.
Option B: Assigning high-level permissions like "Owner" unnecessarily increases risk. Troubleshooting should use roles with only the necessary permissions.
Option C: Deleting the Service Principal without understanding its purpose could disrupt workflows or critical services. A more measured approach is necessary to assess and mitigate risks.
Option D: Rotating credentials ensures that any compromised secrets are invalidated, while reducing permissions to the minimum necessary aligns with the principle of least privilege. This approach mitigates risks without disrupting the Service Principal's intended functionality.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Kubernetes admission controllers operate within the API request lifecycle and evaluate incoming requests before they are committed to etcd, the Kubernetes database. In Falcon Cloud Security, the admission controller enforces policies such as allowing only trusted container images, preventing the deployment of misconfigured workloads, and ensuring security compliance. This ensures that threats are mitigated before they are deployed, reducing the attack surface.
Option B: Network monitoring is a different function handled by network security tools such as Falcon Cloud Security’s workload protection capabilities, which inspect outbound traffic. Admission controllers, however, focus on evaluating and enforcing security policies during deployment.
Option C: Runtime security scanning is an essential security function but is separate from admission controllers. Runtime protection is handled by tools like Falcon Container Security, which continuously monitors running containers for threats. Admission controllers operate at the deployment phase rather than runtime.
Option D: Kubernetes RBAC controls access to resources, while admission controllers validate or mutate requests before resources are created. They do not replace RBAC but can complement it by enforcing additional security policies.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Disabling logging and monitoring violates HIPAA compliance and makes it impossible to detect security incidents. Cloud security requires continuous monitoring, audit logging, and alerting to ensure compliance and threat mitigation.
Option B: Adaptive security rules using behavioral analytics and threat intelligence allow for proactive threat detection and dynamic policy enforcement, ensuring both security and compliance. This method
prevents anomalies and unauthorized access without disrupting legitimate operations.
Option C: Default security group settings from cloud providers are often overly permissive. These must be hardened with least privilege rules to prevent unauthorized access and data exposure.
Option D: An allow-all policy is a major security risk as it removes all access controls, making cloud resources vulnerable to unauthorized access and potential data breaches, violating HIPAA compliance.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: The first step in creating a Falcon Fusion workflow is to define the trigger event that initiates the workflow. This could be a specific detection type or another event in the Falcon platform. Without a trigger, the workflow has no starting point. This step ensures that the workflow activates only in response to the desired conditions.
Option B: While notifying the security team is important, manually sending emails defeats the purpose of automating workflows with Falcon Fusion. Automation is designed to streamline the response process and reduce human intervention.
Option C: Adding conditional steps for approval might be part of the workflow, but it is not the first step.
Conditional logic is applied after the workflow is triggered. Focusing on triggers first is essential.
Option D: While dashboards are useful for monitoring, they are not part of creating workflows.
Dashboards visualize outcomes, whereas workflows focus on defining triggers and actions.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: The "Scan Scope" term is not used in Falcon. While filtering by CVSS score is valid, the configuration should be done via scan rules.
Option B: Configuring scan rules based on CVSS scores enables prioritization of critical vulnerabilities during image scanning.
Option C: Real-time prioritization is not an available feature for Falcon’s registry integrations. Scanning rules are applied during policy configuration.
Option D: "Image Scan Priority" is not part of Prevention Policies. Image Assessment configuration occurs within Cloud Workload Protection.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Default Falcon registry settings may not cover all organizational needs. Custom configurations should be made to ensure alignment with security policies.
Option B: Allowing all registries without authentication increases security risks, as unauthorized or malicious images can be pulled and deployed.
Option C: To ensure pre-runtime protection, administrators should define registry connection details, specify the registry URL, enable authentication (if needed), and set image scanning policies for security compliance.
Option D: Private repositories are not automatically secure. Vulnerabilities can still exist in private images, making it critical to enable scanning even for internal sources.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: While a mismatched container runtime can cause monitoring issues, CrowdStrike supports a wide range of container runtimes. If an unsupported runtime were the issue, it would be flagged during deployment, not afterward.
Option B: While kubelet misconfiguration could cause container management issues, this would typically prevent container creation or result in broader cluster-wide errors, not selective monitoring failures.
Option C: CrowdStrike supports most major cloud providers. Unsupported cloud providers would likely cause deployment issues, not selective monitoring problems.
Option D: This is the correct answer because the DaemonSet ensures that the CrowdStrike sensor runs on all nodes in the cluster. If the DaemonSet is not deployed properly across all nodes, workloads on the unaffected nodes will not be monitored, even though the overall installation appears successful.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Backing up container states is unrelated to runtime protection, which focuses on real-time threat detection and prevention.
Option B: Monitoring API calls is part of Kubernetes control plane security but is not directly related to runtime protection.
Option C: Image scanning for vulnerabilities is a pre-deployment task and does not pertain to runtime protection, which deals with active workloads.
Option D: Runtime protection focuses on safeguarding workloads by detecting and blocking malicious behavior during their execution. It provides continuous monitoring to secure active containerized environments.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon RTR is a powerful tool for incident response, but immediate file deletion without forensic validation can lead to loss of evidence and potential operational impact. Security teams should analyze files before taking action.
Option B: While isolating affected workloads may be necessary, immediately shutting them down could erase critical forensic evidence. The best practice is to investigate the issue while maintaining logs and memory captures for further analysis.
Option C: Deleting logs is a critical mistake. Security logs provide vital information for incident investigation, root cause analysis, and compliance reporting. Logs should be preserved and analyzed, not erased.
Option D: Proper incident response requires documenting the event in an incident report and escalating it through the Security Operations Center (SOC). CrowdStrike Falcon provides detailed logging, detections, and forensic tools that should be used to investigate before taking additional remediation actions.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: While Falcon Discover provides comprehensive visibility into cloud workloads, it requires deployment on monitored environments. The question specifies identifying running processes without deploying a Falcon sensor, so this option is invalid.
Option B: Manually SSHing into VMs to inspect processes is inefficient and does not scale in modern cloud environments. This method increases administrative overhead and risks configuration drift. Additionally, SSH access may not be available due to strict security policies.
Option C: Cloud-native monitoring tools like AWS CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, and Google Cloud Operations Suite allow visibility into running processes, system metrics, and logs without requiring third-party agents. These services can provide runtime data and integrate with CrowdStrike for deeper insights. They are essential for environments where agent installation is limited by operational constraints.
Option D: Built-in antivirus solutions, such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or AWS GuardDuty, focus on threat detection rather than providing detailed runtime process visibility. These tools lack the specificity required to identify and monitor all running processes.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon Discover provides visibility into assets and cloud workloads, but it does not offer runtime monitoring or drift detection capabilities. It is useful for inventory purposes, not runtime protection.
Option B: Falcon Horizon focuses on misconfiguration detection and compliance for Kubernetes and other cloud platforms. While it can identify misconfigurations that might lead to rogue containers, it does not monitor runtime behaviors or detect drift.
Option C: Falcon Cloud Workload Protection (CWP) is specifically designed to monitor containerized workloads in real time, detect rogue containers, and identify drift from expected configurations. Drift detection ensures that workloads adhere to defined security baselines, while runtime protection addresses
rogue or unauthorized containers. This approach is automated and efficient.
Option D: Manual inspection scripts are labor-intensive and not scalable for dynamic containerized environments. They lack the automation and real-time capabilities provided by Falcon CWP.
정답:
Explanation:
Option A: Developers accessing repositories during normal hours is expected behavior, unless there are signs of unauthorized activity.
Option B: Privilege escalation and modification of security policies by a non-administrative user is a strong indicator of risk. This could suggest account compromise, insider threats, or policy violations, requiring immediate investigation.
Option C: Temporary access requests for databases that follow approval workflows do not indicate unauthorized activity or risk.
Option D: A new geographic login might warrant further monitoring, but without additional suspicious actions, it is not a definitive security risk.